Skip to main content

We Wouldn't Hire Them. Why Do We Elect Them?

 We Wouldn't Hire Them. Why Do We Elect Them?

We elect a person thinking they will fix the system the previous regime messed up and ensure it is free from corruption. Unfortunately, what we witness instead is a blame game. When the elected government makes the same mistake, we hear the familiar refrain: "It also happened in the previous government." All we see today is a bunch of selfish people sitting in Parliament and the state assemblies—a few of them with criminal records.

As citizens, we should put the country at the centre and stop using our religious, caste, and atheistic biases when selecting people to represent our needs in Parliament and the state assemblies. Even when we know an MLA or MP has a criminal record or an FIR against them, we still vote for them because of our biases.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: I am sure we would never select a candidate with a criminal record to work for a company—yet we select people with criminal records to represent us. And this is no isolated case. According to the Association for Democratic Reforms, of the 543 members of the 18th Lok Sabha elected in 2024, 251—46%—have criminal cases against them, and 170 of those face serious charges like murder, rape, and kidnapping. Even more damning: candidates with criminal records have a win rate three times higher than those with clean records. When we would never give a job to a stranger with a criminal record, we collectively send 251 of them into the nation's highest lawmaking body. The problem is not the politician alone, but also the people who fail to select the right candidate. Our suffering stems from our biases: we have abandoned the nation and given importance to our dogmas and ideologies.

If such a mentality prevails, we will witness corruption, crimes, threats, and suppression by the very politicians we elected—and finally conclude that democracy does not work. Our inability to understand candidates' backgrounds and our unwillingness to stay unbiased make democracy fail, not its definition.

In the next election, check candidates' profiles and evaluate them before you vote. Our wrong vote takes five years to correct, but by then enough damage is done—and the elected representative will use their influence to come out of the cases and get a clean chit for the next election. The game will continue.

A nation doesn't fail because of a few thousand politicians who sit in Parliament or the state assembly. It fails when its citizens fail to select the right people.

M.L. Narendra Kumar

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

அப்பாà®±்பட்டது காவியம் காலத்துக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது உண்à®®ை உணர்ச்சிக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது பெண்à®®ை கடவுளுக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது மனிதாபிà®®ானின் à®®ேதைக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது தலைà®®ை தலைவனுக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது புரட்சி அரசியலுக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது உறவுகள் உடமைக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது அனுபவம் கல்விக்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது நடப்பு செல்வதற்கு அப்பாà®±்பட்டது எம் எல் . நரேந்திà®° குà®®ாà®°்

Less than a Minute Life Lesson-2410 Promotion and Character

  Less than a Minute Life Lesson-2410 Promotion and Character Promotion is a form of recognition for your competency and character. However, the people below you will relate to you more for your character than your competency. M.L. Narendra Kumar Director Instivate Learning Solutions PVT LTD www.instivatelearning.in

Less than a minute, Lesson-2985 Happiness is a Mature Mind

  Less than a minute, Lesson-2985 Happiness is a Mature Mind The essence of happiness is not the absence of problems nor the presence of material things; it is the maturity of mind to accept success without vanity and failure with dignity.   Maturity lies in balancing between happiness and unhappiness, success and failure. M.L. Narendra Kumar Director Instivate Learning Solutions PVT LTD