From Boss to Leader: Two Management Approaches and Why They Matter
When it comes to handling people and tasks, managers tend to
fall along a spectrum. At one end is the manager who keeps the team merely
busy. At the other is the manager who keeps the team genuinely productive. Most
managers show a mix of both behaviours, depending on pressure, training, and organisational
culture. But the pattern they follow strongly affects engagement, performance,
and retention.
The Busy-Making Manager
This manager loads the team with to-do lists, sometimes
including tasks they consider trivial. Team members are always busy. They work
late into the evening and end the day exhausted. The worst part is that they
often have no time to check whether their work aligns with their KRAs/KPIs.
During reviews, gaps appear. The result is undesired ratings, dissatisfaction,
and sometimes attrition.
This behaviour is not always intentional. It can come from poor prioritisation,
pressure from above, or a lack of leadership training. Still, the outcome is
predictable: a toxic work culture, a disengaged workforce, delayed deliveries,
and business losses.
The Productivity-Building Manager
This manager gives tasks that empower and challenge the team.
They delegate execution while retaining accountability for their own KPIs. They
check team members’ schedules before adding new work. If they assign a major
task outside a team member’s KRAs/KPIs, they ensure it is brought into the
review for rating and convert it into a KRA/KPI. They do not micromanage. They
ensure the team engages in the work and enjoys what they do.
A useful distinction:
·
Busy means high activity, low alignment, little learning, and an
unsustainable pace.
·
Productive means clear priorities, the right capabilities, measurable
progress, and a sustainable pace.
Why the Approaches Differ
The first type of manager uses people and bosses them. The
second type develops people and leads them. The difference is not just
personality. It is also shaped by incentives, workload, training, and whether
the organisation rewards short-term activity or long-term performance.
What Organisations Should Do
Unless managers are trained in leadership skills, organisations
will continue to suffer from toxic work culture, disengagement, attrition,
delayed deliveries, and business losses. If an organisation wants to develop,
it should convert its managers into leaders. Only with a leader’s mindset can
people be led; with a boss’s mindset, they can only be used like resources.
But training alone is not enough. Organisations also need fair
workloads, clear goals, KRA/KPI alignment, psychological safety, recognition,
accountability, and honest review systems. People are human beings with
emotions. Without an emotional connection, you will often see a busy work
culture rather than a productive one. At the same time, emotional connection
cannot replace fair systems and clear expectations.
Practical Actions
For managers:
·
Hold regular one-to-ones.
·
Review workload before assigning
new tasks.
·
Align work with KRAs/KPIs, or
update them when major new work is assigned.
·
Delegate ownership, not just
tasks.
·
Avoid micromanagement.
·
Give credit and recognise
progress.
·
Watch for chronic overtime,
burnout, and disengagement.
For organisations:
·
Train managers in people
development and leadership.
·
Measure engagement, overtime,
attrition, and delivery delays.
·
Ensure ratings reflect actual
work, including tasks added outside original KRAs/KPIs.
·
Reward leaders who build
sustainable performance, not just busy teams.
Conclusion
Instead of nominating only team members for a time-management
program, prioritise managers for a people-development program. Time-management
training can still help team members, but it is not a substitute for good
leadership. Organisations need leaders, not bosses. When managers lead, teams
become productive, engaged, and sustainable. When managers boss, people are
used like resources. The choice shapes the culture, the business, and the
people.
M.L. Narendra Kumar
Comments
Post a Comment